The coming world war.

July 2024 Forums General discussion The coming world war.

Viewing 8 posts - 31 through 38 (of 38 total)
  • Author
  • #252376

    You’re right. Completely irrational from the point of the interest of humanity as a whole. But Starmer is a would-be capitalist statesman and, as such, applies a different logic — that of the interest of the capitalist state he aspires to run.

    Mind you, a case could be made out (as by Labour leftwingers) that it is a waste of capitalist money for the UK capitalist state to have an arsenal of H-bombs since it is never going to use them on its own and probably couldn’t without US permission. On the other hand, without them the UK capitalist state risks being relegated from the second to the third division.

    In any event, everyone can now see what the Labour Party stands for, not that it will prevent some lefties calling for workers to vote for this gang of unprincipled pro-capitalist place-hunters.


    NATO Starmer.

    He’s got to say that, hasn’t he?. After all, where’s the logic in states having nuclear weapons and their politicians saying they’re not prepared to use them?


    If I were the American president I would declare war on Britain. When the British asked for permission to fire their atomic doodle-bugs in retaliation – I wouldn’t give it.


    You dont stop do you, presumably because you can’t. All states prepare for war in the sense of being prepared in the event of a possible attack from another state. In fact all “defence” spending can be described as “preparation for war”.

    The fact that the US is preparing in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan does not mean that a US/China war is “on the cards”, ie very likely. It could even make it less likely in accordance with the military doctrine “if you want peace, prepare for war”.

    That all states have to waste resources on such military preparations is condemnation enough of capitalism without needing to say that it will lead to a third world war.

    Bijou Drains

    So Putin states on behalf of the Russian capitalist class –

    “Asked whether Russia could resort to using nuclear arms, Mr Putin said the conditions for using that arsenal are clearly spelled out in Moscow’s security doctrine.

    “For some reason, they believe in the West that Russia will never use it,” he said.

    “Look at what is written there,” he said of Russia’s nuclear doctrine.

    “If somebody’s actions threaten our sovereignty and territorial integrity, we consider it possible to use all means at our disposal.”

    And this is viewed as a bad and dangerous thing (which it certainly is)

    yet when Starmer says more or less exactly the same thing on behalf of the Western capitalist class, this is seen as a good and reassuring thing. (which it certainly isn’t)


Viewing 8 posts - 31 through 38 (of 38 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.