- This topic has 49 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
October 2, 2016 at 9:47 am #121823lindanesocialistParticipant
AyeOctober 2, 2016 at 10:39 am #121824SocialistPunkParticipant
Wrong again. I did not suspend Vin. He was suspended in March, and has only just recently decided to go through the appeal process that he would have been told about back then.Earlier on this thread, post #12, you claimed the moderators said the EC was responsible for Vin's suspension. You were shown your mistake, yet didn't retract nor apologise for making the false claim.Last night I couldn't really make out what you were on about, but it seems you are now saying I'm to blame for Vin's suspension.This seems to be a habit of your's Linda. Vin does the same. You make accusations and assertions and when shown to be wrong you simply ignore the evidence, adjust slightly to compensate for the facts, rinse and repeat. Almost as if saying them often enough will make them reality. I've seen this tactic used often on various social media sites and I have to say I never thought I would see a day come when members of the SPGB used it.October 2, 2016 at 2:02 pm #121826lindanesocialistParticipantSocialistPunk wrote:Last night I couldn't really make out what you were on about, but it seems you are now saying I'm to blame for Vin's suspension.
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/website-technical/moderators-decision-cde-marattys-indefinite-forum-banYou ARE mod 3 aren't you? This post is banning Vin. Did you vote against as you could have done? No you didn'tSocialistPunk wrote:This seems to be a habit of your's Linda. Vin does the same. You make accusations and assertions a
I think it is your habit of making accusations that someone has made accusations against you and somehow must apologise for the accusations you accused them of making. Re post 12:Vin was told ‘it is the EC you need convince and appeal’ Sound very similar to “the EC has banned you”Read your decision back to yourself.http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/website-technical/moderators-decision-cde-marattys-indefinite-forum-ban If anyon has made accusations and done any misleading it is not meOctober 2, 2016 at 3:00 pm #121827SocialistPunkParticipant
Still getting it wrong.The link you provide is to the thread about the moderators decision on Vin's suspension. What we essentialy said was that Vin needs to go through the appeal process. But he already knew that.moderator2 wrote:After full consultation the moderators decided, Cde Vin Maratty be informed:The indefinite suspension stays in place until further notice from the EC for it to be rescinded. We advise he follows the appropriate procedure and makes a formal appeal to the EC for the ban to be rescinded.
So again, I did not suspend Vin.lindanesocialist wrote:Re post 12:Vin was told ‘it is the EC you need convince and appeal’ Sound very similar to “the EC has banned you”Read your decision back to yourself.
Your sentence construction is very confusing here. However quite simply, they don't, "Sound very similar". You really are clutching at straws.Seeing as the EC decided to deal with Vin's communication to the IC, it simply means that the EC then became the route of appeal for Vin. I'm not really sure why you are having such a difficult time grasping this concept.By the way, you've done plenty of accusing recently.October 12, 2016 at 7:02 pm #121828AnonymousInactive
I don't think this is a very good situation, and it shows that there is not unity within the Socialist Party. Blocking completely a member to communicate with others members and using somebody else to speak for him, might sound like the problem of Nikolai Bukharin and Martov who were blocked by the Bolsheviks. This is not a very good example for newcomers, or potential members
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.