Agenda for April Meeting

August 2022 Forums Regional Branches North East Agenda for April Meeting

Viewing 13 posts - 301 through 313 (of 313 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #119492
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    SocialistPunk wrote:
    Vin and Linda, your form F's were accepted by the branch at the last fun packed meeting.As Tim pointed out you no longer have permission to post on this thread. Please desist.

    Perhaps you need to famiiarise yourself with party SO and Party rules .Non members have a right to attend branch meetings unless you have joined the IC

    #119494
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    I have received a request fro a cde for reconciliation with the party, if you dont want it then let me get on with something more constructive and get on with my form F . I am offering, if you reject then get on with it i am sick of begging and an apologising I have done this for Tim cos I respect him Vin

    #119495
    SocialistPunk
    Participant
    lindanesocialist wrote:
    SocialistPunk wrote:
    Vin and Linda, your form F's were accepted by the branch at the last fun packed meeting.As Tim pointed out you no longer have permission to post on this thread. Please desist.

    You are not in charge, the membership is and I am attempting reconciliatiation as is anon

    Tim wrote:
    Vin you appear to have stated that your opinion is that you have put forward a motion in which your and Linda's form f are submited. You have also stated that in your view the Form Fs have been accepted on the vote by the branch. Although I regret your Form F and have voted against it, your view is that this has now been accepted by the branch. By your own logic you are no longer a member of the party and therefore no longer a member of the branch. As established under party rules non branch members only have the right to speak if this is requested and agreed by the branch. You have not requested such rights and they have not been granted. Therfore I suggest you do not make any further comment at the Branch meeting, these are the rules that you insisted shoudl apply and as a democrat I am of the opinion that the democratically agreed on rules should be abided by. If you are not able to abide by them, then I suggest you are leaving yourself open to moderators to remove your posts.
    #119496
    SocialistPunk
    Participant
    lindanesocialist wrote:
    SocialistPunk wrote:
    Vin and Linda, your form F's were accepted by the branch at the last fun packed meeting.As Tim pointed out you no longer have permission to post on this thread. Please desist.

    Perhaps you need to famiiarise yourself with party SO and Party rules .Non members have a right to attend branch meetings unless you have joined the IC

    Vin wrote:
    SocialistPunk wrote:
    Vin, I'm not a member yet,

     Yes you are. The EC is an administrative body and only needs to rubber stamp or intervene if party rules etc have been contravened : which they havent. But even so you are a member untill EC says otherwise

    So by this logic, you are no longer a member until the EC says otherwise.

    #119497
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    I have come back on here from a request from Tim for reconcialiation.As a last resort.  I told him I did not want to as it would be a wast of time but tim is a good cde and a good socialist which is more tha I can say for you. I do  not feel embarrassed by your rejection as your father has pointed out to me before, it is those that reject the hand of friendship  that are the pricks not the one's who offer it. Or words to that affect. Ask Joe, he will know what I mean. It is somewhere on this forum. 

    #119498
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Tim is trying to heal the situation and I have agreed to try. Can we have some positive feedback?vin

    #119499
    northern light
    Participant

    Mr. Maratty, during one of my attempts at making you see reason, I said something along the lines of, " it takes a big man to hold out the hand of friendship and say he is sorry." I still hold to that statement But just 19 minutes before you posted your attempt at reconciliation ( #296), you posted this #295.  I see no big man holding his hand of friendship.  Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.

    #119500
    Bijou Drains
    Participant

    Joe I think if you re read post 295 it is not written in anomsity, but can be interpreted in a friendly and comradely way.To the rest of the comrades in teh NERB, I wouid say that Vin has (perhaps later than he should) accpeted that his comments to SP were out of order and withdrawn them. Whilst accepting that it would have been far better that Vin had done this at the time th issue was raised, surely it is logical that we accept as branch Vin's comments and move on.With regards to the Form F, to be honest I don't know where we are condsitutionally with that matter, has the meeting closed? has the issue been completed? to be honest itn he shambles of a meeting that took place, I'm buggered if I know. What we could do, is accept that a comrade has made a mistake, accept his apology, hope that we can all learn from the situation and move on for the sake of the party. Do we have that many active socialists int he North east that we can afford to lose them? I do not condone Vin's actions, and should they repeat themselves I would be strong in my condemnation, however I can also accept that he has apologised and take the oportunity to move on and discuss the real issues at stake.YFSTim

    #119501
    SocialistPunk
    Participant
    lindanesocialist wrote:
    I have come back on here from a request from Tim for reconcialiation.As a last resort.  I told him I did not want to as it would be a wast of time but tim is a good cde and a good socialist which is more tha I can say for you. I do  not feel embarrassed by your rejection as your father has pointed out to me before, it is those that reject the hand of friendship  that are the pricks not the one's who offer it. Or words to that affect. Ask Joe, he will know what I mean. It is somewhere on this forum. 

    Are you not embarrassed to post such childish statements?

    #119502
    northern light
    Participant

    [ quote Tim Kilgallon ]    "joe I think if you re read # 295 it is not written in anomosity, but can be interpreted in a friendly and comradely way." [ unquote ] Tim, I have not been a Party member for too long, so I am obviously not as aquainted with Party protocol as your good self.Nevertheless, I am under the opinion that a retiring Branch Secretary should return any" cash in hand" to the Branch Treasurer, along with reciepts of cash spent. It follows therefore, that it is up to the Branch Treasurer, in fulfilling his duty to Branch members, to request any monies held to be handed over. Failure to do so would mean the Branch Treasurer would be in remiss of his duty Like I said, I have not been in the Party that long, but I am keen to learn. So, can you point me to where the rules state that a retiring Branch secretary should send Branch funds held by him direct to Head Office ?Talking about Branch funds, it is now May and not one Branch member has donated so much as a shekel, or a brass farthing towards the running of the Branch. I do not expect members who are on benifits to give anything, but some members are in work

    #119503
    Bijou Drains
    Participant

    Hi Joeon re reading, I had missed the reference to the HO treasurer and read it as treasurer. I agree that the proper course of action would be to return funds to the branch.YFSTim

    #119504
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Joe if you prefer you can send me your bank details vis email and I will send the money directly to you. I do not have receipts for the stamps, envelopes etc but members must have received the letters I sent. I have no evidence of any other sundries  so will send the £69 https://www.dropbox.com/s/v8ur0924niqoq9q/branchAcc.png?dl=0 Vin 

    #119505
    northern light
    Participant

    Vin, I most certainly do not prefer to send my bank details via email. You can send a cheque, postal order, or even cash in a registered envelope. As for receipts, you have already provided an ample record of your cash transactions in post #295 on this thread. I have never doubted your integrity.I wish you well, joe davison

Viewing 13 posts - 301 through 313 (of 313 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.