DJP wrote:’Direct Action’ is
February 2026 › Forums › General discussion › The ‘Occupy’ movement › DJP wrote:’Direct Action’ is
How then do you get round the WDWDITM argument? This is the problem, see. If you are going to sit on the fence with regard to direct action you don’t really have anything to counter reformist claims to be doing something now. Whether we like it or not, whether it is justified or not, socialism is then relegated an ever receding distant future – just a nice idea and nothing more — while people look to reformism as the way to deal with their problems in the here and now/ Telling them that reformism is futile is simply not going to work because the issue is precisely what to do with the here and now which at least reformism presumes to address but which for all practical purposes socialism cannot address I don t think you can be neutral about this matter if direct action a means by which one might effectively counter the massive pull effect of reformism. Direct action may well be very broad and all encompassing but that does not mean one cannot support it in principle. Trade Unionism too can be very broad and all encompassing too and indeed some forms of trade union activity can be highly detrimental to the interests of the working class. One example is strike action motivated by racist or nationalist concerns. Nevertheless;less the SPGB supports trade unionism in principle and I see no reason why it should not support direct action in principle too . Accordingt to Adam it has already declared its support for squatting. And a damn good thing too! You are surely not suggesting that it should not have done this? By all means be discriminating . Don’t just support direct action for its own sake. But in the case of squatting I think the situation is absolutely clear cut. Given the obscenity of millions of empty homes existing alongside homeless people I find it difficult to imagine how any socialist would not rejoice in the fact that some of the latter have taken it into their their hands to bypass the capitalist market and ignore its callous imperative that demands needs be backed up by purchasing power in order to be satisfied at all
