Left wingers,

Left wingers, Marxist-Humanists,  and others so called Marxists can look for all kind of excuses to justify their claim that Marx was a dialectician, or a Hegelian, and they are completely wrong, he did reject dialectic, and he was not thru his whole life a dialectician or a Hegelian.By comparing the mumble jumble of the works of  Hegel with Marx,  we can see  a great difference between both, that idea of the repetition of Hegel thru Marx came from the School of Frankfurt which was a mix of ex-Stalinists, and ex-Trotskyists which never abandoned Leninism, or Trotskyism. They rejected the vanguard party concept but they did not reject Leninism, it was the same case of CLR James, but he did not accept Hegelianism, he also rejected it . Most so called Marxist-Leninists ( creation of Stalin ) are dialecticians, and they support Geitzen concept of dialectical materialismThey are the same allegations made by some Marxist-Humanists that Lenin became  a different person when he was reading Hegel, Lenin was Lenin in 1905, and in 1914, and Marx did not write Capital based on Hegel dialectic either. He developed his ideas based on the economical works of David RicardoMarx can not be studied in one or two paragraph, on in one citation, like the Bible of a pastor, he must be studied within the proper context, and as a whole set of ideas, the same thing took place with Lenin, he only read or based his ideas on the old works of Marx and Engels, like the MH are basing his ideas on the Paris Notebooks. M&E  frequently changed their ideas thru their whole life.Most Marxist do not understand that Marx and Engels changed their Blanquist conceptions after the Paris Commune, and they advocated for the participation of the working class in the universal suffrage, and they continue talking about the workers armed insurrection.I do not think that mankind is going to build a new society based on dialectic, what we need in our brains is a coherent socialist theory, and we have that coherent socialist theory within the socialist party, we have developed socialism,  also contributing with  our own ideas to a very simple level, we have transformed difficutlt ideas into simple ideas.  and we do not need so much intellectualism in order to understand socialism. We have much better issues to deal with.We have already discussed this topic about two times on this forum, we did   not reach any consensus, or any agreement, we had a lot of personal attacks, but nothing else. Personally, i do not give a shit about dialectic, and philosophy,  and I am not a priest of the church of Marx, and I do not think that he was an idealist-materialist either, that is another invention of the Marxist-Humanists