socialist standard (est 1904)

  Journal of the Socialist Party a companion party of the World Socialist Movement
www.worldsocialism.org/spgb  100 years for socialism-> -> Standard Online->->Connecting with->-> socialists->-> worldwide       March 2005
Click on contents (above)
 for no frames version
FEATURES
Global poverty and the UN:Natural disasters
The UN wants to halve global poverty by  2016 and lift 500 million out of misery.  It wouldn't even cost much.So will it happen?
Here 
The Real Class Division
We’re supposed to be moving towards a more equitable society. Well
how come class division is worse than ever, asks Paul Bennett. Here

Meat, Money and Malnutrition
A Vegan society claims that meat is a cause of famine. So could
vegetarianism really help feed the world, or is it all more complicated? Here

Changing the System
If you have no freedom to change your life you may as well be in
prison. Workers in capitalism get more porridge than empowerment. Here

Kyoto: Fiddling while Rome Burns
America’s not in it. China’s not in it. As Kyoto goes live one wonders if
there’s any point in it either. John Bissett looks at the pollution trade. Here

Brown Reorganises Poverty
£6.2 billion was returned to the Treasury in 2002-3 in unclaimed
benefits. Does that mean claimants didn’t need the money? Here

REGULARS
Letters Here

Editorial Here

Pathfinders Here

Red Snapper  Here

Cooking The Books 1.Here

Cooking The Books 2.Here.

Reviews   
Books    TV    Film
    Books Review  tv review 

Meetings...Here

50 Years Ago...Here

Party News...Here
Voice From The Back...Here
with Free Lunch


EDITORIAL


Making capitalism history


Staggering numbers of the world’s people live lives of abject poverty, on one dollar a day or less. They lack access to housing, health care, education, even to clean water, things taken for granted in the ‘developed’ world. Their lives are nasty, brutish and short, brought down by malnutrition and diseases which could be easily treated with simple medicines were these available. They may be victims of wars and expulsions, living in refugee camps or prey to thuggery and violence from governments and other rulers.

It’s not as if nobody knows or cares about their plight. Charities and international aid organisations devote their considerable resources and expertise to valiant efforts to improve the lot of the world’s poorest. Workers in developed capitalist countries willingly make donations to such as Oxfam, believing that they are doing some good in alleviating destitution. Celebrity concerts and fund-raising activities further provide opportunities for collecting money for such good causes.

Yet it all seems to have little effect. Despite the efforts of both the poor themselves and of the aid and charity workers, the conditions of people at rock bottom hardly improve. Indeed more join them as violence, disruptions and natural disasters add to the stock of people with little of their own except their lives. Whole generations are doomed to hunger and squalor until premature death cuts short their misery.

All this is unconscionable. That our fellow human beings are forced to survive in this state is an affront to us all, a vivid demonstration that all is not right with a world where such things happen, alongside billionaires and vastly-expensive military programmes. Nobody surveying the extent of poverty and inequality can be content with such a set-up.

And it is made worse by the fact that it is utterly unnecessary. The world can produce enough food, water and housing materials to provide the basic needs (and more) of all the Earth’s people. The poor simply do not constitute a market — there is no profit to be made out of selling food to the destitute, or from growing food for them. If the one dollar a day will not stretch to buying food, then too bad. Countries supposedly in the grip of famine hardly ever have an absolute food shortage, it’s just that the food available is sold to those who can afford to buy it or exported for consumption elsewhere.

So the solution is not more charity, more fund-raising, more flag days in the local high street. The solution is a world where food —  like all goods — is produced to satisfy need, not to make a profit. Starvation amid plenty would be quite impossible in a socialist society run along the lines of production for use, where there are no poor people and everyone has free access to what has been produced. The knowledge and commitment of farmers, scientists and others would be put towards producing enough food for all. This is technically possible now, but capitalism’s profit motive, its wars and rivalries, do not permit abundance to be realised. A society where all work together will have no problem in achieving the potential that humanity has brought about.

To Contents Here

To Socialist Party Here

To first feature page Here




SOCIALIST PARTY 101st CONFERENCE 2005
101st Annual Conference of The Socialist
Party at Head Office, 52 Clapham High St.
London SW4 on Friday 25th March 2005, 10.30
to 6.30 pm and Saturday 26th March 2005, 11
to 6 pm. All visitors welcome, admission and
refreshments free. Social on Friday evening at
Bread & Roses, Clapham (TBC)

The Socialist Party is a democratic
party run by its
members without leaders of any sort, and the way we make decisions
is open for all to
see at our twice
yearly general
meetings. This
Easter weekend
we will be
discussing a
variety of issues including the following:

  Far from being
all of the same mind on every topic, 


members are very
diverse in their
opinions and
interests, so would it
be a good idea to set up a special
discussion journal
so we can debate
controversial ideas
among ourselves?

  The Declaration
of Principles
was written in 1904, over
a hundred years
ago.


Some
members think
the language is
antiquated and
could do with
modernising.
For instance,
while we
oppose
reformist
movements the use of the word 'hostile' might give the wrong impression.
Alternatively,
others feel that it is a historical
document that
should be left as
written.


  Should we
oblige ourselves to
pay dues, or could we get rid of a whole lot of
unnecessary
bureaucracy if wedumped the dues rule and adopted a
system of voluntary
contribution?

Other items:
Why we keep
overspending,

Colour-coded
politics,

  A press
letter network,


The

word 'ordinary' as a class descriptor

Reports from

departments,

Challenging the
government ban on
political advertising,

Putting more
speculation into the
Standard,

 Wrecking
amendments and
Ideas for more
adventurous
publicity



To Contents Here

To Socialist Party Here

To first feature page Here