Vice’s
homage to virtue
At their annual “World Economic Forum” jamboree in the Swiss ski resort
of Davos in the last week of January, the world’s political and
business leaders vied with each other to strike an “ethical” pose. It
was, commented one newspaper, a case of ethics with everything.
There is even a magazine called the Ethical Corporation. At the time of
the Tsunami its Asia-Pacific editor, James Rose, was active in the
Australian press. “Put profits aside in the rebuilding” read the
headline of one of his articles, “Shareholders should let companies
assist in the post-tsunami reconstruction” (Australian, 4 January).
“Companies must look beyond the bottom line” read another, “Corporate
leaders see only profits as important. They must change” (Melbourne
Age, 7 January).
Shareholders in construction companies would be only too willing to let
them assist in the rebuilding. In fact, shares in them went up in
anticipation of juicy reconstruction contracts. But this was not what
Rose had in mind. Supply lines for aid, he wrote, “could be usefully
shortened if corporations went in and did more of the work themselves,
gratis, under the direction of the charity groups on the ground”, and:
“What we need here is for corporations to throw off the cloak of
self-interest. The best thing they could do is to approach the
situation as it now stands as if it were a legitimate business
opportunity, apart from one important factor: they will expect no
financial or brand rewards”.
It’s a nice thought. The skills and the techniques are there, there are
people in need, so why not bring the two together without any thought
of profit? But it’s not going to happen, because that’s not the way
capitalism works or could ever work.
Capitalism is a profit-making system and capitalist corporations have
no choice but to put profits first. Not because the top executives are
selfish or greedy or insensitive but because that’s the economic logic
of the system. Corporate executives are merely what Marx once called
“personifications of capital” and capitalism is an impersonal economic
mechanism of the accumulation of capital out of profits which those in
charge have to apply irrespective of their personal opinions or
preferences.
Rose is aware of what he is up against as he wrote in the same issue of
The Australian:
“What is a corporation? On one level, it’s a pure money-making machine.
There is solid opinion to say that’s all it can be. Even if a
corporation wants to be a paragon of the New Age, it is constrained by
the fiduciary obligations to its shareholders. It is legally
constructed to focus on its and its owners’ self-interest”.
That opinion is indeed solid, very solid. Corporations don’t seek to
maximise profits just because this is laid down by the law, as Rose
suggests. The law merely reflects the underlying reality of capitalism.
It’s not the law that needs changing – it never will be on this
point – but the whole profit system that needs dumping.
|