
Doing Business,
the World
Bank Way
The World Bank exists to oil the wheels of capitalism: to make funds
available for investment and various infrastructure projects. Basically
it tries to ensure that things run as smoothly and predictably as
possible, and always in the interests of the currently rich and
powerful.Of course, this being capitalism, things do not always go as
planned.
One of the ways in which the World Bank seeks to serve capitalism is by
providing information about investment in different countries. It runs
a website,
http://www.doingbusiness.org/, which gives "objective measures of
business regulations and their enforcement", so making it easier for
capitalists to know the pitfalls of investing in various parts of the
world.
The data on the site cover everything from starting a business to
paying taxes, enforcing contracts and procedures for bankruptcy. One of
the topics dealt with is employing workers, where the indicators, as
they are termed, are how difficult it is to hire a new worker,
restrictions on expanding or contracting the number of working hours,
the difficulty and expense of dismissing a redundant worker and their
costs (expressed in weeks of wages).
So we learn that the USA gets a score of zero for difficulty of hiring
and rigidity of hours, and a redundant worker costs nothing (!) in
terms of firing costs. The UK has higher scores, including 33 weeks'
wages as the cost of dismissing a redundant worker. Germany has much
higher scores on all these, and 66 weeks' wages as the cost of
dismissal. Note that in all cases a higher figure means 'more rigid
regulations', so low scores are good as far as the World Bank is
concerned - for instance, the US has little to stop an employer cutting
or increasing working hours. Russia has a mixture of scores: zero for
difficulty of hiring but nearly as high as Germany for rigidity of
hours.
From a working class point of view, however, the real issue is not how
reliable the scores are or how they differ among continents and
countries. Rather, the crucial thing is what they reveal about how the
bosses view you and me. We aren't people with families and needs,
rather we are just another aspect of doing business.
The ease of acquiring a license or obtaining credit is put on a par
with how easy it is to alter our working hours or how easy and
expensive it is to dismiss us if we become redundant, i.e. no longer
able to produce profits in the way that is required.
For capitalism, members of the working class aren't really human
beings, just costs of production, cogs in the great wheel of making a
profit and keeping the bosses in the style to which they have become
accustomed. A society which is based on production for use will be
centred around people, around satisfying our needs as both producers
and consumers, as parents and friends. Then we can say goodbye to the
World Bank and their offensive economic scores.
|
|
Contents Page Previous page 10 Next page 12
|