|
Editorial
Who
needs finance?
The
downturn in the global economy appears to be broadening and
deepening. The sub-prime slime has became the "Credit Crunch"
in 2008, and last month heralded a further round of casualties on
what some are starting to call "Manic Monday".
US
house repossessions started it all off, followed by mortgage lenders
and banks in Europe. But more recently the US government felt unable
to allow their Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (public mortgage lenders)
go under, but stopped short of baling out Lehman Brothers.
The
contagious fear of vanishing profits extended beyond mortgages to
insurance giant AIG and beyond, and the geographical spread has
widened to China and Japan.
Workers
could be excused feeling some sort of schadenfreude at the news of a
bank running out of money or an insurance company failing to manage
risk and hedge their bets. Who can fail to smile as another financial
institution is found to have ignored its own advice ("The value
of your investment can go down as well as up. You may not get back
the amount of money you invested and should only invest sums of money
you are prepared to lose").
So
there may be fewer stories in the news of £100 burgers in the
bistros or £30,000 drinks bills in the restaurants of the City
of London, but of course the economic downturn impacts more on the
poor than the rich.
World
socialists are opposed to capitalism – boom or bust. Recession just
helps throw into sharp relief the logic of the market system. It does
however also provide a good opportunity to highlight some important
differences between capitalism, and socialism – where money and
wages would not exist and production of wealth would be based on
meeting real human needs.
Firstly
of course inside socialism there will be no work at all for the whole
financial sector that is under such pressure at present. Pensions
advisors, insurance salespersons, "independent" financial
advisers, mortgage brokers, fund managers: all of these jobs are
essential to the smooth operation of capitalism, but are
socially-useless and would have no place in a socialist society.
Over
1 million people in the UK – 4 percent of the workforce – are
engaged in such activities which are wholly useless. When you factor
in related jobs such as accountancy, real estate, and ancillary
financial services the numbers mount up. Socialism will really make
these positions redundant, but with the pay-off that people will be
free to engage in work that is genuinely productive and socially
useful.
The
market system is an incredibly wasteful mechanism for organising the
production of wealth. It prevents people’s power over production.
Interest rates rise in the US, and a hospital gets mothballed in the
UK? The oil price rises and thousands of holidaymakers get stranded
in a foreign country? The need for constant minute-by-minute
re-evaluations of cashflow projections or return on investment
expectations, for every project, every industry, every product
results in a colossal waste of the planet's resources and humanity's
energy and ingenuity.

|