|
The
French elections: Mr Nasty wins
The
recent round of elections in France resulted in the rout of the
French Left. Were the workers wrong not to vote for them?
I
wonder if you can still buy that little gadget which used to be sold
in joke shops. It was a black plastic box with a slot on the top. You
put a penny in the slot and it made a weird grinding sound which
suggested that something amazing was about to happen. After about 15
seconds a small flap opened and a plastic hand flashed out and pulled
the penny down into the box from which it could not be rescued.
Clunk!
The
sudden shock of seeing one’s own credulity taken advantage of and
the resulting gasp of recognition is what many people may have
experienced after the French Presidential electoral campaign in May.
Nicolas Sarkozy – a kind of Gallic equivalent of Margaret Thatcher
– is now in power for the next five years. France is no longer the
exception in Europe.
Strangely
enough although he managed to gain a large slice of the working-class
vote, Sarkozy actually promised very little to the workers. Indeed he
can be counted on to increase exploitation, unemployment and poverty.
The reformist “Socialist Party” (PS) represented by
Ségolène
Royal promised a hell of a lot more but the voters seemed
unconvinced.
As
always the presidential election was presented by some as an almighty
struggle between Left and Right with Sarkozy quite effectively
playing the role of Mr Nasty. By contrast, Ségolène
Royal proved to be completely ineffective. Her
insipid and uninspired version of social reformism fooled no-one. To
make matter worse, she presented herself in interviews as someone
with a calling, an instrument of destiny. (Well, she does come from
the same area as Joan of Arc).
For
his supporters Sarkozy was represented as the epitome of modernity,
economic liberalism, dynamism, and Blairism. His early morning
jogging sessions contrasting with the more sedate political tradition
of the conservatives in the party he inherited from Jacques Chirac.
Royal was castigated for having expressed the outdated values of the
Left, public sector immobilism, heavy taxes, anti-americanism and
(don’t laugh) Marxism.
So
much for the media Punch and Judy stuff. In reality this was a
typical election under modern capitalism. Media constructed
stereotypes, disinformation, mystification and rumour crowded out
reasoned argument and the impartial presentation of the facts. In the
final analysis, the differences between the candidates were often
minimal.
European
Constitution
Anyone
who knows anything about French politics knows that the real agenda
of the election was the European Constitution problem. Because of
growing distrust of an increasingly free-market Europe, the projected
constitution originally dreamed up by Giscard D’Estaing
was thrown out in a referendum in 2005. Besides being a set-back for
capitalist politicians bent on creating a single competitive space to
counter the other big capitalist nations, this was an issue which
neatly divided the PS into two groups, the pro-constitution
leadership and the anti-constitution left-wing with its popular base.
As
a result Royal was obliged to promise yet another referendum on the
issue whilst Sarkozy promised to negotiate a mini-constitution which
would be ratified by parliament, short-circuiting the scruffy
Euro-sceptics who were inevitably enough presented as ‘extremists’. With Royal’s idea being a clear
non-starter, the capitalist money was clearly on Sarkozy from the
start, all the more since Sarko’s treaty
could be ratified with the social aspects of the constitution edited
out.
One
of Sarko’s first moves after the
election therefore was to meet Angela Merkel to talk about the issue.
With Merkel’s government currently
putting the German welfare state on a slimfast diet with active help
from the Social Democrats this is one obstacle out of the way. In
Britain, Sarko can count on New Labour’s
dyed-in-the-wool opposition to a social Europe.
As
for French PS, well, their Mr Europe – Jean-Pierre
Jouyet – has
just
joined Sarko’s government. He was already
on a train to Brussels on 15 May and nobody is calling him a traitor
to the socialist cause (not even Royal, a close personal friend)
|