Skip to Content

Nomination for the AV Committee

50 posts / 0 new
Last post
SocialistPunk
SocialistPunk's picture
Offline
Joined: 17/08/2012

lindanesocialist wrote:

YOU are responsible for a comrade's suspension and censorship. You have also accused VIn of paranoia. If you stopped for a moment to think about it...............

You seem to be suggesting that I suspended Vin?

I'm off to bed now. Nighty, night Linda.


lindanesocialist
Offline
Joined: 28/03/2016

This is the socialist party we are not controlled by committees or moderators like the Stalinist, Leninist and trot groups. We are a democratic organanisation run by its members.

You should have no control over what Vin says or wishes to say

I can only hope that one day you will eventually comprehend what I am saying

fraternally

 

lindanesocialist
Offline
Joined: 28/03/2016

duplicate

lindanesocialist
Offline
Joined: 28/03/2016

SocialistPunk wrote:

You seem to be suggesting that I suspended Vin?

I'm off to bed now. Nighty, night Linda.

You did, you are!

 

Nite Nite, sleep well

lindanesocialist
Offline
Joined: 28/03/2016

Aye

SocialistPunk
SocialistPunk's picture
Offline
Joined: 17/08/2012

Wrong again. I did not suspend Vin. He was suspended in March, and has only just recently decided to go through the appeal process that he would have been told about back then.

Earlier on this thread, post #12, you claimed the moderators said the EC was responsible for Vin's suspension. You were shown your mistake, yet didn't retract nor apologise for making the false claim.

Last night I couldn't really make out what you were on about, but it seems you are now saying I'm to blame for Vin's suspension.

This seems to be a habit of your's Linda. Vin does the same. You make accusations and assertions and when shown to be wrong you simply ignore the evidence, adjust slightly to compensate for the facts, rinse and repeat. Almost as if saying them often enough will make them reality. 
I've seen this tactic used often on various social media sites and I have to say I never thought I would see a day come when members of the SPGB used it.


lindanesocialist
Offline
Joined: 28/03/2016

 

SocialistPunk wrote:

Last night I couldn't really make out what you were on about, but it seems you are now saying I'm to blame for Vin's suspension.

http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/website-technical/moderators-de...

You ARE mod 3 aren't you? This post is banning Vin. Did you vote against as you could have done? No you didn't

 

 

SocialistPunk wrote:

This seems to be a habit of your's Linda. Vin does the same. You make accusations and assertions a

I think it is your habit of making accusations that someone has made accusations against you and somehow must apologise for the accusations you accused them of  making.

 

Re post 12:Vin  was told ‘it is the EC you need convince and appeal’ Sound very similar to “the EC has banned you”

Read your decision back to yourself.

http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/website-technical/moderators-de...

 

If anyon has made accusations and done any misleading it is not me

SocialistPunk
SocialistPunk's picture
Offline
Joined: 17/08/2012

Still getting it wrong.

The link you provide is to the thread about the moderators decision on Vin's suspension. What we essentialy said was that Vin needs to go through the appeal process. But he already knew that.

moderator2 wrote:

After full consultation the moderators decided, Cde Vin Maratty be informed:

The indefinite suspension stays in place until further notice from the EC for it to be rescinded.

 We advise he follows the appropriate procedure and makes a formal appeal to the EC for the ban to be rescinded.

So again, I did not suspend Vin.

lindanesocialist wrote:

Re post 12:Vin  was told ‘it is the EC you need convince and appeal’ Sound very similar to “the EC has banned you”

Read your decision back to yourself.

Your sentence construction is very confusing here. However quite simply, they don't, "Sound very similar". You really are clutching at straws.

Seeing as the EC decided to deal with Vin's communication to the IC, it simply means that the EC then became the route of appeal for Vin. I'm not really sure why you are having such a difficult time grasping this concept.

By the way, you've done plenty of accusing recently.


mcolome1
Offline
Joined: 04/11/2011

I don't think this is   a very good situation, and it shows that there is not unity within the Socialist Party. Blocking completely a member to communicate with others members and using somebody else to speak for him, might sound like the problem of Nikolai Bukharin and Martov who were blocked by the Bolsheviks.  This is not a very good example for newcomers, or potential members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Login or register to post comments