Atheist Muslim

April 2024 Forums General discussion Atheist Muslim

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #85611
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    Might be a useful book to ourselves even if not exactly offering a materialist analysis.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/atheist-muslim-islam-donald-trump-ali-rizvi-quran-religion-pakistan-saudi-arabia-libya-islamophobia-a7832346.html

    Quote:
    Rizvi agreed that political, economic and social factors have contributed to violence in the Muslim world, but added that the Quran contains some violent passages that “completely fit” the actions of Isis. 

    “Islam is neither a religion of war nor a religion of peace. It's just a religion, like any other religion,”

    #128082
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    Another interesting article on the rise of militant Islamism

    Quote:
    The export of Wahhabism got off the ground after the Islamic revolution in Iran. The revolution had dramatically shaken the Saudis. When Iran started exporting its Shiite ideology, the Saudis felt threatened by it. Around that time, in 1979, hardliners seized the Grand Mosque in Mecca. The Saudis launched an ideological offensive and said, "Now we are exporting our own ideology. We will show the hardliners in our own country what we are capable of achieving." Then, they started promoting Wahhabism through intermediaries and organizations like the World Muslim League in different countries throughout Asia, Africa and parts of Europe – for example, in former Yugoslavia where Muslims and Christians fought against each other in the civil war. Wahhabists saw it as gateway, where money was needed since the Muslim population was ready for a new and radical ideology.The result is that, in many parts of the world, a radical form of Islam is gaining the upper hand. I have experienced this first hand in Southeast Asia. In southern Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, and sometimes Malaysia, it was always said that a special form of Islam was practiced, a much more open, much more tolerant version. There has been a dramatic development towards radicalism over the past three decades. It is perfectly clear that this development has been encouraged by Saudi money. Moreover, young intellectuals have been recruited with generous scholarships at Saudi universities. These people return to their homes after having studied at Saudi universities and suddenly carry out Wahhabi missionary work in all their home countries.

    http://www.dw.com/en/saudi-arabia-exports-extremism-to-many-countries-including-germany-study-says/a-39618920

    #128083
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    And another thought-provoking article here: "What ISIS Really Wants"

    Quote:
    Virtually every major decision and law promulgated by the Islamic State adheres to what it calls, in its press and pronouncements, and on its billboards, license plates, stationery, and coins, “the Prophetic methodology,” which means following the prophecy and example of Muhammad, in punctilious detail. Muslims can reject the Islamic State; nearly all do. But pretending that it isn’t actually a religious, millenarian group, with theology that must be understood to be combatted, has already led the United States to underestimate it and back foolish schemes to counter it. We’ll need to get acquainted with the Islamic State’s intellectual genealogy if we are to react in a way that will not strengthen it, but instead help it self-immolate in its own excessive zeal.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/

    #128084
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    A defence of "liberal" islam.http://www.dw.com/en/islam-makes-germany-more-diverse-scholar-says/a-39629807

    Quote:
    If you want to interpret the scriptures verbatim, you would be a fundamentalist. If you try to translate the meaning of the scriptures into the current context and use intellect to decide what makes sense, what's logical, what is even relevant in our world today, then you'd be liberal. If you say you want to adapt some traditions to today's times but some values are incredibly important to you, even if theoretically you know you would need to develop them further, you would be a conservative or traditionalist.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.