

The
17th Congress of the Chinese ‘Communist’ Party was held back in
October. It was five years since the previous one, so this is clearly
not a decision-making body that determines how the party — and
therefore the country — should be run. Rather it’s a rubber-stamp
gathering that endorses what the CCP’s power-holders have already
decided. The Central Committee is ‘elected’, but even that meets
less than once a year, and it is the political bureau and its
standing committee (nine men in dark suits) who really run things.
The
CCP has changed over the years. It now has over 70 million members,
and another 20 million applicants for membership. The growth of
private capitalism in China has led many of the wealthiest people in
the country to join the party. In the Hongdou textile group, which
has assets of over a billion yuan (around £60 million), all the
high-level managers are party members. Another capitalist, Liang
Wengen, who has a fortune of three billion yuan (£190 million),
was a delegate to the congress. If private entrepreneurs can join the
party, he said, it “helps to enhance the brand recognition of our
company.” Western companies may promote their brands by sponsoring
football teams, while in China they do so by joining the ‘Communist’
Party!
A
new party constitution was adopted at the congress. This talks about
building ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’, which includes
a supposed socialist market economy, i.e. “optimizing resource
allocation while giving play to market forces”. As the balance
shifts towards private rather than state capitalism and state-owned
enterprises are increasingly listed on the stock market, all pretence
at any connection to Marxism has long since been dropped.
Instead,
the rich are getting much much richer. According to some reports
there are over a hundred billionaires in China, while the average
income is less than $1000 a year. No wonder many Chinese workers,
especially in the south, are prey to the ‘snakeheads’ who promise
good jobs and decent wages in return for a huge fee for smuggling
people out of China and across to Europe. The jobs and pay are never
quite what is promised, of course, but the prospect is better for
many than the grinding poverty of life in China. Within China there
are 120 million migrant workers who have moved to the cities to find
work and yet fail to escape poverty and exploitation.
In
December, the China Labour Bulletin published a report on the
workers’ movement in China 2005-6 (see
http://www.clb.org.hk/en/files/File/research_reports/Worker_Movement_Report_final.pdf).
It begins as follows:
“After
working repeated overtime shifts for an entire month, Hu Xinyu, a
25-year-old employee at the Huawei factory in Shenzhen, collapsed and
died from multiple organ failure on May 28, 2006. Two days later, Gan
Hongying, a 35-year-old woman employed in a clothing factory in the
Haizhu district of Guangzhou, died after working a total of 54 hours
and 25 minutes (22 hours overtime) in the previous four days. A few
weeks later, a senior union official publicly admitted that China’s
official trade union was virtually powerless to prevent forced
overtime in factories across the country.”
So
workers endure forced overtime in dangerous conditions while the
bosses count their ill-gotten gains and flaunt their membership of
the ‘Communist’ Party. It’s still capitalism, and becoming less
and less different in any way from the kind found in the West.
PB

|