Present: Bissett (Gen Sec), Browne, Carter, Lambert (Chair), Lawrence,
Miller, Simkins, Stair, Thomas, White.
1. Amendment and Adoption of Previous EC Minutes
1.1) Browne queried the reporting of the letter from Cde Patrick Ndege
(Uganda), item 2.5 of the May EC Minutes, asking if a personal reply
should have been referred to. It was pointed out that the reply from
Cde Ndege was in response to a letter the EC had asked Cde Simkins to
write to the comrades in Kenya to ascertain their views on the famine
there. It therefore counted as EC business (from February EC Minutes:
item 10.3.ii: Lawrence & Thomas: "That Cde Simkins be requested to
represent the Party in contacting the comrades in Kenya regarding the
desperate state of famine that is developing in that country.")
1.1.i) Lawrence& Thomas: "That the minutes be adopted." Agreed, 8
for, 2 abstaining.
2. Matters Arising from February EC Meeting
2.1) Re. item 2.2.i of May EC Minutes and the resolution arising from
discussion on re-listing head office for residential use: "Thomas &
Carter: "That the matter be deferred one month to enable the EC to
consider the letter in full." Carried: 9-0.
2.1.i) Agreed to defer until consideration of the report from the
Premises Committee (item 6.3 below)
2.2) Relating to item 2.3.iv of May Minutes (pertaining to the request
from comrades in Kabale, Uganda for a grant for radio broadcasts etc:
Lawrence & Carter: "That the matter be deferred one month."
Carried: 8 for, 1 against.) and item 2.3.iii of April Minutes (Thomas
and Lambert: "That the matter be deferred". Agreed 8-0) and item 6.5 of
March Minutes (Email from Kabale Group, Uganda, containing a report
dated 28th February and a budget proposal. Agreed to defer
consideration until next EC meeting).
2.2.i) This item was debated at length by the meeting. The item had
been deferred for three meetings now, the EC feeling it best to hold
off making a decision on the grant request because of pending
Conference motions on the matter of sending money overseas. The meeting
was aware of the votes arising from the ballot (copied below) and that
this now meant there was a change in Party policy on sending money
overseas. Members felt bad about stringing the Kabale comrades along
for three months, having asked them for further info as to their
proposed radio broadcasts, holding out the hope that their requested
grant would be agreed by the EC after Conference and it was generally
felt by members that they had let them down, hampering the work of a
quite active group in Africa. It was queried how the Kabale comrades
would respond to the Party's decision not to send money overseas.
Members agreed the EC were "victims of a lack of foresight", that they
had "pussyfooted" on the issue, that they had "acted appallingly"
,
but wished to act in good faith. In voting as the EC did on this matter
(below) members observed that the resolutions drew attention to the
fact that they were acting against a Conference resolution and on an
issue branches felt strongly about. It was also pointed out that there
were no previous party rules on sending money overseas as such and that
the EC, in the past, had considered each request on its merits. EC
members were sincere in their desire to encourage members to be active
and believed there was a good group working on behalf of socialism in
Uganda. The meeting, having voted as follows, announced its intention
to learn from its mistakes and to not repeat this transgression again.
2.2.ii) Miller & Thomas: "That the grant to Kabale be sent with
apologies for the delay".
2.2.iii) Lawrence & Lambert moved an amendment: "Delete 'with
apologies for delay'".
2.2.iv) Miller asked to withdraw as mover of the original resolution,
but the meeting was informed that this was now the EC's motion.
2.2.v) Vote on the amendment: Carried: 5 for, 1 against, 4 abstaining.
2.2.vi) Miller & Thomas moved and addition to precede their
original resolution: "As the request was received months in advance of
the Conference decision, the EC considers it appropriate to apply
pre-Conference rules, and.". Lost: for 3, against 5, and 2 abstaining.
2.2.vii) Vote on the substantive resolution: Carried: for 5, against 3,
abstaining. 2
2.2.viii) Division called for. For: Browne, Lambert, Lawrence, Thomas
and Simkins. Against: Carter, Stair and White. Abstaining: Bissett and
Miller.
2.3) Re. item 2. 4.ii of May EC Minutes, pertaining to discussion of
the Standard's editorial for April/draft election leaflet and the
resolution: Lawrence & Browne: "That the matter be deferred pending
consideration of the SSPC's reply to Comrade Thomas." Carried 9-0.
2.3.i) The SSPC had replied in an email, dated 12th May to Cde' Thomas'
email of 16th April regarding the real source of power. This matter had
arisen at the April meeting with members expressing concern at the text
of a draft election leaflet which also formed the basis of an Editorial
in the April issue of the Socialist Standard. The SSPC replied thus:
"It depends on what is meant by the word 'power'. If the editorial had
said that wealth was the source of political power it would have been
wrong, but it only says of power. And of course wealth does give those
with it a certain amount of economic decision-making power, which was
the point that was trying to be made: that decisions about what, where
and when to produce are made by unelected people on the basis of them
being wealthy. Of course their decision-making powers are limited by
the workings of the market. But so are those of elected councillors and
MPs who, in practice, as the editorial pointed out, have to act as
managers of the general affairs of the wealthy and in their interest."
The reply from the SSPC generated further debate at the table on the
nature of political power.
2.3.ii) Lawrence & White: "That the SSPC be asked to print a
clarification of the April 2006 editorial on the question of power,
giving due weight to the decisive importance of political power."
Agreed: 8 for, 2 abstaining.
2.4) Re. item 3.4 of May EC Minutes, pertaining to the Conference Floor
Resolution: Lawrence & Martin: "This Conference recommends that the
EC sets up an ad-hoc committee to construct models of Party decision
making alternatives to the present procedures." Carried: 10-7. May's EC
meeting moved (item 3.4.i): Thomas & Lambert: "Defer one month."
Carried: 9-0.
2.4.i) Members discussed the democratic dilemma the Party had been
facing in recent years, with fewer branches and inquorate branch
meetings - all of which meant that the basis for democratic decision
making was getting weaker. Members echoed the call for alternative
methods of democratic involvement which had been raised by Conference
delegates.
2.4.ii) Lawrence & Miller: "That a call be made for nominations to
an ad-hoc committee to construct alternative models of party decision
making and that the closing date be the next EC meeting. Agreed 10-0.
2.5) Re. item 6.2 of May EC Minutes, pertaining to the outstanding
legacy from the Estate of G Pooley.
2.5.i) The ad-hoc committee, set up after the May meeting had agreed to
pursue the matter via a solicitor. An exchange of correspondence
between the solicitor acting on behalf of the Party (John Briggs) and
the solicitors charged with looking after the Estate of G Pooley
(Bennett Richmond Solicitors of Consett, Co. Durham) was presented to
the meeting. The solicitors in Consett claimed that since October 2003,
when the Estate was to go to the Party, they had experienced difficulty
establishing the identity of the organisation to benefit under the
will, citing a split in the party since the will was made. They had
since identified ourselves as the rightful beneficiaries. Dividends
relating to shares held by the Estate were also mistakenly paid to
another shareholder which necessitated the hiring of an accountant to
ascertain which shares be allocated to the Estate. The Consett
solicitors enclosed a letter from Gerrard Investment Management stating
that as of March 2006 the residue of the estate amounted to
£105,736.
Communication between the Party's solicitor and the solicitors in
Consett was ongoing, one point of contention being that had the Party
received the legacy almost three years ago, when it should have accrued
to us, then the figure would have been considerably higher.
2.5.ii) Miller & Carter: "That the correspondence be noted and that
the EC ask the ad-hoc committee to furnish further reports as
information becomes available." Agreed 10-0.
2.6) Re. item 9.2 of May EC Meeting. Notice of business: Cde White
raising the matter of members claiming expenses.
2.6.i) Cde White submitted a paper to the meeting entitled Controlling
Claims for Expenses. Cde White referred to a recent case where a member
was charged in relation to an expense claim, suggesting that procedures
for claiming expenses are tightened up. Whilst in some instances
members' expenses were essential, Cde White argued that most Party work
should be voluntary. Cde White offered the following recommendations:
A) Requests for ad hoc expenses be made to the EC for consideration in
advance of the activity being carried out. B) That such expenses should
not be paid from the various departmental budgets. C) That the request
for expenses should include details of all intended costs. D) That only
expenses agreed by the EC be paid and that receipts, proofs of
purchases, be provided for the Treasurer before payment is issued.
2.6.ii) Members felt that although normal procedures could be abused,
the suggestions were to restrictive and bureaucratic. In the past 18
months the Treasurer had produced a new expenses claim form. Other
members believed that we just had to trust members, indeed, that the
Party ran on trust, and that the case cited (above) was an exception.
Often decisions on what expenses to pay had to be made on the spot and
Cde White's proposals did not take account of this. The Treasurer said
that most claims were for travel and sustenance expenses and that to
date he was only aware of one fraudulent claim. The Treasurer was asked
if he could refuse expenses claims, the answer being yes if the payment
was not authorised or if it was not part of procedures.
2.6.iii) Agreed to note.
3. Conference Voting Results:
3.1) The close of ballot being the 2nd June, Cde Browne of the Standing
Orders Committee presented the meeting with a report on voting figures
on Conference motions and statistics pertaining to the ballot.
3.1.i) 369 voting papers were issued and 150 ballot papers returned -
or 41% of members returned ballot papers, up from 121 last year. Three
overseas members (Uganda) had voted by email. One ballot paper was not
signed and thus not included in the count.
3.2) Motion 1. "That no money be sent to overseas groups" (Manchester
Branch).
Vote 1. For: 69 Against: 74 Abstain:
6 MOTION Not Carried.
3.2.i.) Agreed to note.
3.3) Motion 2. "This Conference rules that the Party shall cease
sending money grants to overseas groups or individuals, but shall
continue to give every assistance to socialist activities abroad by way
of printing and dispatching campaign material from Head Office."
(South London Branch).
Vote 2. For: 79 Against:
63. Abstain: 7 MOTION Carried.
3.3.i) Agreed to note
3.4) Motion 3. "That no more by-elections be contested as they appear
to be a waste of money." Lancaster Branch.
Vote 3. For: 72 Against:
70 Abstain: 7 MOTION Carried.
3.4.i) Agreed to note
3.5) Motion 4. "This Conference is in favour of Head Office being
used for the purposes of regular evenings of musical/cabaret/political
events." South London Branch.
Vote 4. For: 129 Against: 16
Abstain: 4 MOTION Carried.
3.5.i) Agreed to note.
3.6) Motion 5. "This Conference rules that 2002 edition of the pamphlet
Socialist Principles Explained be withdrawn and that the 1975 edition
be re-issued with appropriate minor amendments." South London
Branch.
Vote 5. For: 66 Against:
66 Abstain 17 MOTION Not Carried.
3.6.i) Agreed to note.
3.7) Motion 6. "This Conference rules that it is policy that any
socially useful law will be retained in Socialism." South London
Branch.
Amendment to Motion 6: "That the word 'law' be replaced with
'regulatory measures'." West London Branch.
Vote 6. On the amendment. For: 83
Against: 50 Abstain 16 Carried
Vote 7. If amendment carried. For:
87 Against: 46 Abstain: 17 Carried
Vote 8. If motion unamended. For: 53 Against: 81 Abstain: 15
MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.
3.7.i) Agreed to note)
3.8) Further to the Standing Orders report on conference voting, the
returns of votes from Branches was: Birmingham 6, Central London 8,
East Anglia 10, Edinburgh 4, Enfield & Haringey 3, Glasgow 9,
Lancaster 6, Manchester 10, North East 7, South London 9, Swansea 8,
West London 13, Central 55. Total 149
4. Accounts
4.1) Treasurer presented meeting with accounts for the period 1st
January - 31st January 2006 and 1st February - 28th February. The
report on the Deposit Account was delayed because The Treasure had had
a bout of illness and also because of PC problems.
4.2) Treasurer reported that meetings with the Cde Worker, who the EC
had appointed as assistant to the Treasurer on a three-month trial had
proved problematic, with Cde Worker only turning up for one of three
scheduled meetings.
4.2.i) Browne & Lambert: "That Cde Workers' trial appointment as
assistant to the Treasurer be terminated and that a new call be made
for an Assistant Treasurer." Agreed: 10-0
5) Forms A
5.1) One Form A received for Cde John Helps via the Membership
Department.
5.1.i) Thomas & Miller: "That the Form A for Cde Helps be
accepted." Agreed: 10-0.
6. Reports from Officers, Departments and Sub-Committees
6.1) Letter from the Advertising Department, dated 25th May 2006. The
Department was seeking EC authorisation to place three more ads in
Private Eye magazine over the next three issues at a total cost of
£300. They also sought authorisation to place ads on the events
page of
the New Statesman, combining notices of meeting and offers of free
literature, every two months over the next six months at a total cost
of £105.75 (3 x £35.25).
6.1.i) Miller & Stair: "That the grant be accepted." Agreed: 10-0.
6.2) Report from the Publications Department, dated 2nd June 2006. The
Department reported that Marie Chesham had been busy at HO, phoning
various booksellers and asking them to stock Socialism or Your Money
Back. The campaign had proved quite successful and orders were already
coming in. The Department further reported that a new Party pamphlet,
comprising two short pamphlets by John Keracher - Producers and
Parasites and Economics for Beginners had been drafted and was under
review.
6.3) Report of the Premises Committee, dated 2nd June, 2006.
6.3.i) The Committee had nominated Cde Howard Comber for the Premises
Committee. Cde Comber attended HO several days a week and did valuable
work with regards the upkeep of the building. Cde Comber's acceptance
accompanied the nomination.
6.3.i.a) Agreed to accept Cde Comber on to the Premises Committee.
6.3.ii) The Committee reported that shortly after midnight on 31st May
a burglary was carried out at HO, the thief taking two red cash jars
(containing £60.00), the Party's MiniDisk recorder, Cde Miller's
digital camera and PC power supply. The Committee further reported that
several times in recent months members had arrived at HO to find the
premises empty and with the outer front door open and the back door
open, other members in the building having popped out to a shop.
Members urged that the outer door be locked at all times when the
ground floor and balcony are unoccupied and that the last person to
leave the building checks windows and doors. Various proposals were
discussed by the meeting, including the use of a key book detailing who
the HO key holders were, with members signing for keys, and the
production of a security checklist that could be strategically placed
around HO.. Members also raised the possibility of getting HO insured
for contents.
6.3.iii) The Committee reported that since Cde Smith had left HO the
building was far less tidy. Members who came to HO tended to be
occupied with other tasks and hence had little time to clean up. The
Committee asked that the EC grant a budget for employing someone to
clean HO thoroughly on a regular basis, and were prepared to source
quotes from various individuals and agencies. Cde Stair presented the
meeting with a letter from Global House, inclusive of a specification
of the work they would carry out at HO and a quote for cleaning HO for
one day per week for £120 per month. The meeting was further
alerted to
the fact that a comrade was prepared to come into HO and clean the
building thoroughly one day per week for £50.00 (this being
raised at a
previous EC meeting) and that other members had offered competing bids.
The ensuing debate focused chiefly on the difficulty in keeping such a
large building clean and whether the Party needed outside contactors
coming into clean HO when in the past this work had been carried out on
a voluntary basis by members.
6.3.iii.a) Lawrence & White: "Next business." Lost: 4 for, 6
against.
6.3.iii.b) Browne & Simkins: "This EC grants the Premises Committee
£500 for a three-month trial for cleaning HO." Lost: 3 for, 5
against,
2 abstaining.
6.3.iii.c) General agreement that the Premises Committee seek help in
cleaning Head Office from within the Party's membership
6.3.iii.d) Lawrence & Browne: "Next business." Agreed: 6 for, 2
against, 2 abstaining.
6.3iv) Re. the deferred item 2.1 (above). The EC had had time to
consider the deferred letter that Cde Lawrence had presented to the May
meeting relating to possibility that the Party investigate the
re-lisiting of HO for residential use and thus having to pay Council
Tax and perhaps applying for a reduction in our business rates. Cde
Miller informed the meeting that as he was no longer eligible for
Housing Benefit the local council would not be querying his living
arrangements.
6.3iv.a) Agreed to note Cde Lawrence's letter.
6.3.v) The Premises Committee further reported on renovations completed
at HO. The entrance to the basement was fitted with a new door, door
frame and staircase. A new door was fitted in the utility room. A new
thermostatic cylinder was fitted in the utility room. Broken
thermostatic valves had been replaced on the radiators and the system
has been balanced. Furniture has been rearranged in the archive room,
library, bedroom (previously Gen Sec's office) and the top floor
landing. This had freed up much space in the archive room and improved
access to the cabinets on the landing. Various doors and walls had been
painted and touched up. Further improvements would include the painting
and touching up of doors, walls and furnishings and the fitting of a
light-switch near the basement entrance. A new large poster advertising
the DVD would be produced and installed in the wall hoarding fixture
outside of the building and other posters would be prepared for the
front window display.
6.3.vi) The Committee queried when Cde Lambert would be available to
perform repairs to the outside of the building so that scaffolding
could be erected and were informed in one month's time.
6.4. Report received from Internet Department, dated 2nd June 2006.
6.4.i) The Department referred to the recent break down of one of the
PCs at HO, citing that the likely cause was static electricity. A
replacement hard drive was installed and Cde Miler was trying to obtain
the necessary parts to enable us to extract info from the damaged one.
As per the EC's previous instruction, SUSE Linux 10.0 had been
installed on one of the office PCs. The other PC had been disinfected
and still ran Windows XP and would do so until the membership database
could be transferred to a standard format. Microfilters had been
installed on telephone jacks at HO to prevent a previous and ongoing
glitch which meant the internet connection was severed when the phone
was used.
6.4.ii) Pursuant to last month's Internet Dept report, Cde Miller had
since contacted the registrar for the socialiststudies.org.uk
domain name and had the domain deactivated. Cde Miller presented to the
meeting a letter he had sent the Socialist Studies group, informing
them that the use of the name was not sanctioned by ourselves and
offering to transfer the domain name. A response was received on 31
May, presented to the meeting, in which the Socialist Studies group
demanded that we cease using the domain name spgb.org, the URL http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/,
and the email address spgb@worldsocialism.org.
Heated debate focussed on whether Cde Miller was indeed authorised to
write to the Socialist Studies group. Reference was made to item 6.3 of
the May EC Minutes when mention was first made of the communication
with the Socialist Studies group and the disputed domain name. Cde
Miller, at that meeting, had offered to sort the matter out, and
indicated that he would be contacting the group.
6.4.ii.a) Lawrence & Thomas: "Any future official contact with the
Socialist Studies group be made by the General Secretary in conjunction
with the EC." Lost: 3 for, 7 against.
Division called for. For: Lawrence, Thomas and White. Against: Bissett,
Browne, Carter, Lambert, Miller, Simpkins, Stair.
6.4.ii.b) Stair & Browne: "That the Internet Department continue to
deal with the matter relating to the Socialist Studies Group's domain
name." Agreed: 5 for, 4 against, 1 abstaining.
6.4.iii) The Department's report also informed the EC that several
Party members had brought to their attention the fact that other
organisations had registered domain names identical or similar to our
own. Moreover, these organisations' websites identified themselves as
"The Socialist Party" and/or "The Socialist Party of Great Britain".
The Department had been asked if it were possible to persuade or enjoin
these organisations from using the domain names and/or have them
transferred to ourselves. The Meeting was briefed by the Internet
Department on various methods of disputing the use of the domains,
including the domain registry's dispute resolution services. The
registry provides a free service for filing a complaint and for
mediation, plus an optional £750 + VAT arbitration service.
According
to the registry, 55% of complaints are resolved through mediation and
therefore without cost.
The ensuing debate focussed on whether the Party should dispute the
domain names and whether the cited possible £750 was a cost that
needed
to be paid.
6.4.iii.a) Stair & Lambert: "That the Internet Department be
instructed to dispute the suggested domain names." Agreed: 5 for, 3
against, 2 abstaining.
Division called for. For: Bissett, Browne, Carter, Lambert, Stair.
Against: Lawrence, White and Simkins. Abstaining: Miller & Thomas.
6.4.iv) Audio Digitisation. Cde Miller was investigating the costs of a
MiniDisc player which can output digital audio to a PC. The Sony
Walkman MiniDisc player, previously purchased by the party, was
incapable of digitally copying the audio data from the MiniDisc, the
device having only an analogue headphone-out jack and USB connection.
6.4.iv.a) Agreed to note.
6.4.v) The Internet Dept recommended the Party maintains regular
off-site back-ups of data stored on the computers at HO. Cde Miller
volunteered to make periodic back-ups on DVD-ROM, but another member
would be needed to periodically collect the back-ups discs at HO and
store them at their home or in another safe location.
6.4.v.a) Members who regularly attended HO would be asked if they would
look after the back-up discs.
6.4.vi) Work planned or in progress and mentioned in previous reports.
Cde Miller was preparing to sell books, deemed too valuable to be sold
via the second hand bookshelves at HO, on eBay. The anti-static mats
ordered by HO did not function as advertised. For the moment the static
problem seems to have abated with summer's increased humidity. For the
moment the efficiency of the mats could not be tested
6.4.vi.a) Agreed to note..
7) Correspondence from Branches, Companion Parties, Members.
7.1) Minutes of the Kabale Socialist Club (Uganda) meeting held on 30th
April. Minutes had been posted on spintcom.
7.1.i) Agreed to Note.
7.2) WSPNZ Minutes for 11th May.
7.2.i) Agreed to Note.
7.3) Letter from RE Hainsworth, dated 24th May 2006. This letter was
from the son of the late Arthur Hainsworth, a former long time
subscriber to the Socialist Standard, and included a cheque for
£70.00
which Mr Hainsworth wished to be used to pay for a year's Standard subs
for 10 people who could not afford a subscription.
7.3.i) Agreed to Note. The General Secretary would send a reply to Mr
Hainsworth, thanking him for his donation..
7.4) Letter from Patrick Ndege, Kenya, dated 24th May 2006. Cde Ndege
expressed his personal views on the Conference motions pertaining to
sending money overseas.
7.4.i) Agreed to note. General Secretary would send a reply to Cde
Ndege.
7.5) Self-nomination from Cde Howard Comber for the Library and
Archives Committee.
7.5.i) Agreed to accept the self-nominations.
8) Forms F.
8.1) The meeting received two Forms F for Kevin Lennon of North East
Branch (deceased) and Euan Duthie (resigned).
9) Any Other Business.
9.1) Cde Bissett informed the meeting that he would need travelling
expenses shortly as he wished to travel to Cde Taylor's home in
Alfreton near Derby, so they could work together on editing new video
based on film taken of a Party day school. Cde Taylor had specialist
editing software and hardware.
9.1.i) Noted.
9.2) Cde Bissett informed the EC (the matter also posted in spintcom)
that Cde Taylor no longer wished to look after the socialist-tv.com
website, on which the film Capitalism and other Kids' Stuff could be
viewed, as much of her time spent looking after the site had been with
regards the site's forum. Cde Bissett suggested that the socialist-tv.com
site is closed down and a separate page opened up on the Party website
from which the video could be accessed, which would mean that we only
have to pay the streaming costs of the video.
9.2.i) Stair & Thomas: "That the Party instructs the Internet
Department to take over the running of socialist-tv. Agreed: 8 for, 1
against, 1 abstaining.
9.3) Cde Stair presented the meeting with the INC leaflets as first
reported in the February Minutes (item 10.1). The three-way folded
leaflet advertised the Socialist Standard on the front and inside. The
circulation of this leaflet was 250,000, being inserted in various
magazines.
9.3) Cde Stair informed the meeting that he would shortly be away from
HO on holiday and that arrangements were being made for someone to
cover for him at HO.
9.4) Secretary reminded meeting that a call was still to be made for
departmental budgets for the next 12 months - these in the past usually
having been made by the June EC meeting.
With no further business to discuss the meeting adjourned at 20.30
Next meeting: 2.00 pm, Saturday, 1st July at Head Office.
Chair for next meeting: Carter
PLEASE NOTE:
1. That a call is made for nominations to an ad-hoc committee to
construct alternative models of party decision making and that the
closing date will be the next EC meeting on 1st July.
2. A call is made for an Assistant Treasurer.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|