. ..continued from
previous page 6
sectarian ghettoes were fraying at the edges as people of different religions moved cautiously into one another’s areas.
Bigotry had receded
somewhat as a player in
politics and now with the gun out of the way there seemed hope that politics would
normalise into
the usual phoney squabble
over the inadequacies of
capitalism.
But in offering peace the IRA had thrown a bomb into politics both north
and south of the
infamous Border.
When the republicans
inaugurated their political
strategy with the unveiling of
constitutional
Republican Clubs, William Craig,
the unstable Unionist Minister of
Home Affairs, responded
with a banning order. This
was open to being used as
a justification of new
IRA violence, in replacement
for the absurd notion that the “right” of armed struggle was bequeathed to the IRA by the results of a
questionable election in
1918.
In the north a political lout in a dog collar, energised by inherited bigotry and
a bad strain of
megalomania, was about to
create opportunities for the promotion of violence in protestant heartlands and spawn and motivate the utterly violent Provisional IRA. Ian Paisley was becoming a politician through the back door.
In the south, too, the IRA’s declaration of peace was giving yesterday’s
republicans now aboard
the establishment gravy
train some concerns. It was common knowledge that ‘Communists’ of the Leninist genre had edged their way into the leadership of the IRA and Sinn Fein and it was this influence that had
brought closure to the
faltering armed struggle.
Among church and state leaders, victims of their own fevered ignorance, the
comfortable corruption
of capitalism could conceivably
come under threat. From some
remarkable sources, in politics and industry, faith and self-interest
combined to conjure up
another IRA to counter the influence
of the Leninist-dominated one.
From the south the help was practical while in the north Paisley and his
political ilk were
fabricating conditions favourable to the emergence and rapid growth of the new Provisional IRA.
The banned Republican Clubs were not alone in creating the movement for
civil rights in Northern
Ireland but they probably
were the main promotional
engine. Labourites,
Communists, trade unionists,
even unionists as well as people of different religions and none took aboard the methods and the anthem of the American Civil Rights movement to demand the extension of the democratic franchise to all adults in local
government elections
together with a points system for the allocation of social housing and an
end to gerrymandering of
electoral boundaries.
Such democratic proposals were anathema to the man who is now the leader of the so-called Democratic Unionist Party and prospective first minister. Paisley articulated the gutter thinking of politico-religious unionism.
The Provisionals went
into the murder business,
responding with gun and bomb
to the demagoguery of
Paisley and his bigoted
cohorts. Catholic-nationalist
bigotry was feeding on
that of its opposite number
and putting flesh on the body of that republican interest that wanted to
dish the ‘commies’ of the
old IRA and get back to the
form of politics they knew best. It was a grim, irrational reciprocity that
over the years spread like a
political malaise in
Northern Ireland and, as we saw from the recent election results, finally
affected even those of a
less unwholesome political disposition.
Is there a Hegelian irony in these recent election results? Will power and political reward sate the ambitions of those at the forefront of Northern
Ireland’s infamous
‘antithesis’? Will the fear-inspired
electoral capture of the less bigoted
weaken the bigotry of the two extremes?
Will the threats, bribery and unmitigated
corruption of the British and
Irish governments combine with
these factors to create
an uneasy peaceful synthesis?
If so, will it last?
We shall see, but one thing we can predict with absolute confidence: even
the peculiar nexus of
Sinn Fein and the ‘Democratic’
Unionist Party combined
in a government based on
clearly-defined sectarian
lines will have less effect on
conditions in Northern
Ireland than the workings of
global capitalism.
RICHARD
MONTAGUE
|
|
^Top^
Contents Page Previous page 6 Next page 8
|