|
In 1956 the IRA of the time, under
pressure from a
competitor terrorist
group in Ulster, were
prematurely pushed into
inaugurating a ‘Border’
campaign. The name
defined the strategy: volunteers,
largely from the south but augmented
by others from traditional heartlands
of northern republicanism,
would confine their
campaign to attacks within
the general vicinity of the Border. Belfast, especially, was to be avoided
lest the touch paper of
inter-religious violence should
be ignited.
The first IRA operation was a raid for arms on the British army barracks
in Armagh. It was
well-planned and brilliantly
executed and on a Saturday
afternoon, while
soldiers carried out their duties
in a relaxed mood, the IRA moved stealthily among them loading military ordinance onto trucks. Not a sound was heard and certainly not a funeral note, for the raiders were away with their booty before an embarrassed military establishment raised the alarm.
It looked as though this undoubted success had exhausted the strategic genius
of the IRA. A similar
move against a military
barracks in Omagh several weeks
later ended in a fire
fight in which several of
the raiders were captured. After that it was all down-hill and after a while abortive attacks on well-protected police
stations gave way
to chopping down telegraph
poles and issuing grandiose communiqués.
It was, from an IRA standpoint, a pathetic period of military attrition
that ended in a
spectacular statement from
them in 1962. The statement
was effectively one of
surrender to the political
realities of the time. The IRA
castigated the Catholic
nationalists of Northern
Ireland for denying them any
meaningful support and
angrily accused them of
‘selling their heritage for a mess of pottage’ – a reference to the social welfare package introduced by the UK government and, ironically, legislatively
imposed on the
Unionist government of Northern
Ireland.
That event, that statement which should have had extraordinarily
significant
implications for all the
people of the North, and
especially so in the light of
subsequent events, has
been expunged from history
by the opposing political
interests in Ireland,
north and south, because all
those interests were complicit
in the events that
followed. Significantly, the
IRA statement did not say it was
abandoning the political
struggle; it said it was
giving up armed struggle and would henceforth pursue a constitutional
struggle for the achievement
of civil rights and an ending
of religious discrimination.
There had not been any significant sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland
since
1935. Demand for the
implements of war between
1939 and 1946 had brought
relative prosperity to
shipbuilding, aircraft and
engineering produce and largely
removed the sore of job
discrimination during those
years. With growing
unemployment religious
discrimination was returning
but its effects were being
mollified to some extent
by the new social welfare
legislation. The traditional
|
|
Contents Page Previous page 5 Next page 7
|